Couldn't figure out where else I should put this thread, so I figured that it would be okay over here... for now.
So basically, my question to everyone is...
"Is Gotham City better with Batman in it?"
One of the things that I have noticed in a lot of takes of his character is that even though there was a lot of corruption in the city before Bruce took on the mantle of Batman, it's only after that he starts operating as Batman that more crazy and even powerful villains start emerging within there.
Some villains owe their very existence, albeit unintentionally, because of Batman's actions (aka the Joker and Red Hood).
So do you guys see Gotham as still being better off with Batman being there?
So basically, my question to everyone is...
"Is Gotham City better with Batman in it?"
One of the things that I have noticed in a lot of takes of his character is that even though there was a lot of corruption in the city before Bruce took on the mantle of Batman, it's only after that he starts operating as Batman that more crazy and even powerful villains start emerging within there.
Some villains owe their very existence, albeit unintentionally, because of Batman's actions (aka the Joker and Red Hood).
So do you guys see Gotham as still being better off with Batman being there?
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire