It seems like the price of admitting Spidey into the MCU is rebooting the character, again. At this point I have ask, was the 2012 Spidey reboot pointless? Sony could have done this deal with Marvel back in 2012. This would be the third reboot in a relatively short amount of time (Spider-Man 3 was only 7 years ago).
I felt Amazing Spider-Man covered too much of the same ground Spider-Man 1 covered and Amazing Spider-Man 2 had some of the problems Spider-Man 3 had, Spider-Man 2 is still the best of the bunch.
I felt the 2012 reboot happened way to soon after the Raimi Trilogy ended. I guess my preference is to try and fit the stuff Sony did with the new movies into the MCU (since I think another reboot at this point would kind of silly and too soon), but since Marvel doesn't want, I am wondering what this new Spidey franchise will do to avoid covering the same ground and making the same mistakes as the last two Spidey franchises.
I felt Amazing Spider-Man covered too much of the same ground Spider-Man 1 covered and Amazing Spider-Man 2 had some of the problems Spider-Man 3 had, Spider-Man 2 is still the best of the bunch.
I felt the 2012 reboot happened way to soon after the Raimi Trilogy ended. I guess my preference is to try and fit the stuff Sony did with the new movies into the MCU (since I think another reboot at this point would kind of silly and too soon), but since Marvel doesn't want, I am wondering what this new Spidey franchise will do to avoid covering the same ground and making the same mistakes as the last two Spidey franchises.
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire