samedi 1 novembre 2014

"Ragnarok" a means to recast?

At the press event Feige said that "Thor: Ragnarok" is a very important movie in their upcoming slate of films. He kinda mentioned that casually, but what if there's more to this statement?



I'm not too familiar with the comics' Ragnarok, but iirc after all of the Asgardian gods had fallen, they became normal people living on earth. Not only that, they were looking differently too. So after Thor returned/woke up, he had to search anyone of them, and remember them that they were gods once. Am I right so far?



So, we know that the contracts of the MCU's actors won't last forever. They're expiring sooner or later. Of course there's still the possibility to prolong them. But what if MARVEL is planning to recast all of them instead? In that case, Ragnarok would be the ideal opportunity imo! After all Ragnarok means "end of all things"... Don't get me wrong, I'd rather have RDJ, Chris Evans, Chris Hemsworth and the others reprise their roles again and again, but it'd be foolish to believe that's going to happen. The other option is killing them off, which I'm not really keen on either.



If they're doing this, there are two ways:



1. After Ragnarok, have the heros be aware that they've changed. However I think that would take away from whatever storyline is happening in the respective film. It would take too much time for them realising it and finding out how to turn back normal again.



2. Have them go on as if nothing happened. Only the audience would be aware that new actors are playing the beloved roles. It could end up quite confusing, but I think it's the better way to go.



What do you think?




Aucun commentaire:

Enregistrer un commentaire